<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is your Facebook Business Page legitimate?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rosemcgrory.co.uk/2011/01/19/is-your-facebook-business-page-legitimate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rosemcgrory.co.uk/2011/01/19/is-your-facebook-business-page-legitimate/</link>
	<description>Social Media Marketing Agency offering  training, consultancy &#38; management for businesses. London &#38; Midlands UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:56:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosemcgrory</title>
		<link>http://www.rosemcgrory.co.uk/2011/01/19/is-your-facebook-business-page-legitimate/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rosemcgrory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosemcgrory.co.uk/?p=383#comment-55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From memory, the Fan Page confusion is probably Facebook&#039;s fault as that&#039;s what they were originally called. Then the light dawned that businesses using it = revenues for Facebook in the long term, and the terminology got tweaked a little bit.
The comparison with committing to a website design is interesting -  I think you&#039;ve hit on a problem with social media generally! On the surface it appears so &quot;quick and easy&quot; to jump in to that businesses sometimes don&#039;t think about why they&#039;re doing it, or what the long term goals are - and before you know it, it&#039;s easy to have put in many hours of work to no particular end?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From memory, the Fan Page confusion is probably Facebook&#8217;s fault as that&#8217;s what they were originally called. Then the light dawned that businesses using it = revenues for Facebook in the long term, and the terminology got tweaked a little bit.<br />
The comparison with committing to a website design is interesting &#8211;  I think you&#8217;ve hit on a problem with social media generally! On the surface it appears so &#8220;quick and easy&#8221; to jump in to that businesses sometimes don&#8217;t think about why they&#8217;re doing it, or what the long term goals are &#8211; and before you know it, it&#8217;s easy to have put in many hours of work to no particular end?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.rosemcgrory.co.uk/2011/01/19/is-your-facebook-business-page-legitimate/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Lane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosemcgrory.co.uk/?p=383#comment-54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True but its so easy for anyone to leap in a create a page for their business compared to creating a website design. And this ease actively encourages more people to get involved. It doesn&#039;t help that people in the &#039;industry&#039; try to confuse and create mystery around facebook by talking of fan pages which it seems are good old business pages.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True but its so easy for anyone to leap in a create a page for their business compared to creating a website design. And this ease actively encourages more people to get involved. It doesn&#8217;t help that people in the &#8216;industry&#8217; try to confuse and create mystery around facebook by talking of fan pages which it seems are good old business pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
